Argentina
OECD accession country since 2022; adherent to the Recommendation on Public Integrity since 2020
This set of indicators covers countries’ strategic frameworks on anti-corruption. These could consist of a single strategy or be spread across multiple strategies, but all strategies must be adopted at the highest level of government (council of ministers/cabinet, president or parliament/congress). Data for OECD members was published in 2021 and 2024 with information relating to 2020 and 2023, respectively. Data for non-OECD countries was published in 2024, with information relating to 2023.
| ARG | ARG | ARM | AUS | AUT | AUT | BOL | BIH | BRA | BRA | BGR | CAN | CAN | CHL | CHL | COL | CRI | CRI | HRV | CZE | CZE | DNK | DNK | DOM | ECU | EST | FIN | FIN | FRA | GRC | GRC | GTM | HND | HUN | HUN | ISL | ISL | IDN | IRL | JPN | JOR | KAZ | KOR | XKX | LVA | LVA | LTU | LTU | MEX | MEX | MDA | MAR | NLD | NLD | NOR | NOR | PRY | PER | PER | POL | PRT | PRT | ROU | ROU | SRB | SYC | SVK | SVK | ESP | SWE | SWE | SWE | CHE | CHE | TUR | TUR | UKR | GBR | USA | USA | ZMB | ARG | ARM | AUS | AUT | BOL | BIH | BRA | BGR | CAN | CHL | COL | CRI | HRV | CZE | DNK | DOM | ECU | EST | FIN | FRA | GRC | GTM | HND | HUN | ISL | IDN | IRL | JPN | JOR | KAZ | KOR | XKX | LVA | LTU | MEX | MDA | MAR | NLD | NOR | PRY | PER | POL | PRT | ROU | SRB | SYC | SVK | ESP | SWE | CHE | TUR | UKR | GBR | USA | ZMB | OECD_AVG | OECD_AVG | OECD_AVG | OECD_AVG | APAC_AVG | APAC_AVG | APAC_AVG | EU27_AVG | EU27_AVG | EU27_AVG | EU27_AVG | Eurasia_AVG | Eurasia_AVG | LAC_AVG | LAC_AVG | LAC_AVG | MEA_AVG | MEA_AVG | SE_Europe_AVG | SE_Europe_AVG | SE_Europe_AVG | SE_Europe_AVG | BEST | BEST | BEST | BEST | ALL_AVG | ALL_AVG | ALL_AVG | ALL_AVG | OECD_ACC_AVG | OECD_ACC_AVG | OECD_ACC_AVG | OECD_PARTNER_AVG | OECD_PARTNER_AVG | OECD_PARTNER_AVG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 71.4 | 100 | 85.7 | 42.9 | 85.7 | 57.1 | 57.1 | 57.1 | 71.4 | 71.4 | 85.7 | 0 | 0 | 85.7 | 0 | 100 | 57.1 | 57.1 | 42.9 | 85.7 | 100 | 14.3 | 14.3 | 0 | 71.4 | 71.4 | 71.4 | 28.6 | 100 | 57.1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 85.7 | 100 | 0 | 0 | 85.7 | 0 | 14.3 | 14.3 | 57.1 | 42.9 | 14.3 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 85.7 | 42.9 | 85.7 | 42.9 | 14.3 | 0 | 0 | 42.9 | 71.4 | 71.4 | 85.7 | 85.7 | 85.7 | 100 | 71.4 | 57.1 | 0 | 85.7 | 85.7 | 0 | 42.9 | 71.4 | 14.3 | 57.1 | 0 | 57.1 | 57.1 | 71.4 | 85.7 | 71.4 | 71.4 | 71.4 | 71.4 | 85.7 | 42.9 | 85.7 | 57.1 | 57.1 | 71.4 | 85.7 | 0 | 85.7 | 100 | 57.1 | 42.9 | 85.7 | 14.3 | 0 | 71.4 | 71.4 | 71.4 | 100 | 57.1 | 0 | 0 | 85.7 | 0 | 85.7 | 0 | 14.3 | 14.3 | 57.1 | 42.9 | 14.3 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 42.9 | 85.7 | 42.9 | 0 | 42.9 | 71.4 | 85.7 | 85.7 | 100 | 57.1 | 0 | 85.7 | 0 | 71.4 | 57.1 | 57.1 | 71.4 | 85.7 | 71.4 | 71.4 | 49.8 | 57.8 | 78.6 | 59.9 | 33.3 | 85.7 | 46.4 | 59.8 | 67 | 78.6 | 68.6 | 64.3 | 64.3 | 69.4 | 52.4 | 56 | 42.9 | 42.9 | 71.4 | 60.7 | 57.1 | 59.5 | 100 | 100 | 85.7 | 100 | 53.2 | 54.9 | 67.9 | 56.6 | 78.6 | 75.5 | 75.5 | 41 | 57.1 | 42.9 |
List of indicators for Quality of strategic framework
Click on an indicator to see the criteria that are used to calculate it.
Top performing and underperforming criteria in Argentina
This table shows the criteria within this dataset where the selected country performs the most above and below average. OECD countries are compared to the OECD average and partner countries are compared to the partner country average. Only criteria fulfilled by less than 40% of countries are shown as leading, and only criteria fulfilled by more than 40% of countries are shown as lagging.
Within the last five years, an inter-institutional body has prepared and published an analytical report on public integrity risks that formulates recommendations and sets priorities for the whole public integrity system. | 16% of OECD countries fulfill | 16% of OECD partner and accession countries fulfill | Leading | |
At least one responsible body has initiated consultations with the general public and/or civil society organisations on its monitoring reports during the latest full calendar year or the year prior to that. | 16% of OECD countries fulfill | 19% of OECD partner and accession countries fulfill | Leading | |
All monitoring reports draw conclusions and have a dedicated section with recommendations to management. | 16% of OECD countries fulfill | 25% of OECD partner and accession countries fulfill | Leading | |
All public integrity strategies in force have undergone mandatory inter-institutional and public consultation processes. | 32% of OECD countries fulfill | 41% of OECD partner and accession countries fulfill | Lagging |
All strategies include a situation analysis, including identification of existing public integrity risks. | 42% of OECD countries fulfill | 53% of OECD partner and accession countries fulfill | ||
All strategies contain outcome-level indicators for the public integrity objectives. | 32% of OECD countries fulfill | 31% of OECD partner and accession countries fulfill | ||
All strategies set target values for all outcome-level indicators. | 21% of OECD countries fulfill | 19% of OECD partner and accession countries fulfill | ||
At least one strategy refers to at least one international legal instrument relating to public integrity. | 53% of OECD countries fulfill | 56% of OECD partner and accession countries fulfill |