Brazil
OECD accession country since 2022
This set of indicators covers countries’ strategic frameworks on anti-corruption. These could consist of a single strategy or be spread across multiple strategies, but all strategies must be adopted at the highest level of government (council of ministers/cabinet, president or parliament/congress). Data for OECD members was published in 2021 and 2024 with information relating to 2020 and 2023, respectively. Data for non-OECD countries was published in 2024, with information relating to 2023.
| ARG | ARG | ARM | AUS | AUT | AUT | AUT | BOL | BIH | BRA | BRA | BRA | BGR | CAN | CAN | CHL | CHL | CHL | COL | COL | CRI | CRI | CRI | HRV | CZE | CZE | DNK | DNK | DOM | ECU | EST | FIN | FIN | FRA | DEU | GRC | GRC | GTM | HND | HUN | HUN | ISL | ISL | IDN | IRL | JPN | JOR | KAZ | KOR | XKX | LVA | LVA | LTU | LTU | LTU | MEX | MEX | MEX | MDA | MAR | NLD | NLD | NLD | NOR | NOR | NOR | PRY | PER | PER | POL | PRT | PRT | ROU | ROU | SRB | SYC | SVK | SVK | ESP | ESP | SWE | SWE | SWE | CHE | CHE | TUR | TUR | TUR | UKR | GBR | USA | USA | USA | ZMB | ARG | ARM | AUS | AUT | BOL | BIH | BRA | BGR | CAN | CHL | COL | CRI | HRV | CZE | DNK | DOM | ECU | EST | FIN | FRA | DEU | GRC | GTM | HND | HUN | ISL | IDN | IRL | JPN | JOR | KAZ | KOR | XKX | LVA | LTU | MEX | MDA | MAR | NLD | NOR | PRY | PER | POL | PRT | ROU | SRB | SYC | SVK | ESP | SWE | CHE | TUR | UKR | GBR | USA | ZMB | OECD_AVG | OECD_AVG | OECD_AVG | OECD_AVG | OECD_AVG | APAC_AVG | APAC_AVG | APAC_AVG | EU27_AVG | EU27_AVG | EU27_AVG | EU27_AVG | EU27_AVG | Eurasia_AVG | Eurasia_AVG | LAC_AVG | LAC_AVG | LAC_AVG | LAC_AVG | MEA_AVG | MEA_AVG | SE_Europe_AVG | SE_Europe_AVG | SE_Europe_AVG | SE_Europe_AVG | BEST | BEST | BEST | BEST | BEST | ALL_AVG | ALL_AVG | ALL_AVG | ALL_AVG | ALL_AVG | OECD_ACC_AVG | OECD_ACC_AVG | OECD_ACC_AVG | OECD_ACC_AVG | OECD_PARTNER_AVG | OECD_PARTNER_AVG | OECD_PARTNER_AVG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 71.4 | 100 | 85.7 | 42.9 | 85.7 | 85.7 | 57.1 | 57.1 | 57.1 | 71.4 | 85.7 | 71.4 | 85.7 | 0 | 0 | 85.7 | 85.7 | 0 | 71.4 | 100 | 57.1 | 57.1 | 57.1 | 42.9 | 85.7 | 100 | 14.3 | 14.3 | 0 | 71.4 | 71.4 | 71.4 | 28.6 | 100 | 28.6 | 57.1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 85.7 | 100 | 0 | 0 | 85.7 | 0 | 14.3 | 14.3 | 57.1 | 42.9 | 14.3 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 85.7 | 85.7 | 42.9 | 85.7 | 42.9 | 71.4 | 14.3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 42.9 | 71.4 | 71.4 | 85.7 | 85.7 | 85.7 | 100 | 71.4 | 57.1 | 0 | 85.7 | 85.7 | 85.7 | 0 | 42.9 | 71.4 | 14.3 | 57.1 | 0 | 57.1 | 0 | 57.1 | 71.4 | 85.7 | 71.4 | 71.4 | 71.4 | 71.4 | 71.4 | 85.7 | 42.9 | 85.7 | 57.1 | 57.1 | 85.7 | 85.7 | 0 | 85.7 | 71.4 | 57.1 | 42.9 | 85.7 | 14.3 | 0 | 71.4 | 71.4 | 71.4 | 100 | 28.6 | 57.1 | 0 | 0 | 85.7 | 0 | 85.7 | 0 | 14.3 | 14.3 | 57.1 | 42.9 | 14.3 | 100 | 100 | 85.7 | 42.9 | 85.7 | 71.4 | 0 | 42.9 | 71.4 | 85.7 | 85.7 | 100 | 57.1 | 0 | 85.7 | 85.7 | 71.4 | 57.1 | 0 | 71.4 | 85.7 | 71.4 | 71.4 | 49 | 57.8 | 78.6 | 64.9 | 59.4 | 33.3 | 85.7 | 46.4 | 58 | 67 | 78.6 | 85.7 | 72.1 | 64.3 | 64.3 | 69.4 | 52.4 | 77.1 | 53.8 | 42.9 | 42.9 | 71.4 | 60.7 | 57.1 | 59.5 | 100 | 100 | 85.7 | 100 | 100 | 52.5 | 54.9 | 67.9 | 66.7 | 56.6 | 78.6 | 75.5 | 85.7 | 77.6 | 41 | 57.1 | 42.9 |
List of indicators for Quality of strategic framework
Click on an indicator to see the criteria that are used to calculate it.
Top performing and underperforming criteria in Brazil
This table shows the criteria within this dataset where the selected country performs the most above and below average. OECD countries are compared to the OECD average and partner countries are compared to the partner country average. Only criteria fulfilled by less than 40% of countries are shown as leading, and only criteria fulfilled by more than 40% of countries are shown as lagging.
At least one responsible body has initiated consultations with the general public and/or civil society organisations on its monitoring reports during the latest full calendar year or the year prior to that. | 24% of OECD countries fulfill | 22% of OECD partner and accession countries fulfill | Leading | |
The responsible body(ies) have initiated consultations with relevant state administration bodies to discuss the monitoring report(s) during the latest full calendar year. | 34% of OECD countries fulfill | 28% of OECD partner and accession countries fulfill | Leading | |
Monitoring reports are published for all action plans, at least once a year, and publicly available no later than 3 months after the defined reporting schedule. | 26% of OECD countries fulfill | 34% of OECD partner and accession countries fulfill | Leading | |
All strategies include a situation analysis, including identification of existing public integrity risks. | 47% of OECD countries fulfill | 50% of OECD partner and accession countries fulfill | Lagging | |
At least one non-state actor has been a member of a working group mandated to develop or amend public integrity strategies in force. | 39% of OECD countries fulfill | 41% of OECD partner and accession countries fulfill | Lagging |
Within the last five years, an inter-institutional body has prepared and published an analytical report on public integrity risks that formulates recommendations and sets priorities for the whole public integrity system. | 18% of OECD countries fulfill | 16% of OECD partner and accession countries fulfill | ||
Each existing strategy is based on an assessment of public integrity risks, identifying as a minimum specific types of relevant integrity breaches, the actors likely to be involved, as well as the expected likelihood and impact if the risk materialises. | 18% of OECD countries fulfill | 13% of OECD partner and accession countries fulfill | ||
Each existing strategy refers to at least 4 out of the following 8 sources of information related to public integrity: (a) indicators from international organisations or research institutions, (b) employee surveys, (c) household surveys, (d) business surveys, (e) other survey data, such as user surveys, or polls from local research institutions, (f) data from public registries (e.g. law enforcement, audit institutions, national statistics office), (g) published research documents from national or international organisations or academia (e.g. articles, reports, working papers, political economy analysis) and (h) commissioned research. | 39% of OECD countries fulfill | 34% of OECD partner and accession countries fulfill |