OECD Public Integrity IndicatorsHome

Chile

OECD member since 2010

This set of indicators covers regulations and practice aimed at promoting integrity in the justice system and ensuring accountability through the disciplinary system for civil servants. Data for both OECD members and non-OECD members will be released in 2025.

Regulatory framework for judicial integrity
ARGARMAUSAUTBELBRABGRCANCHLCOLCRIHRVCZEDNKDOMECUFINFRADEUGTMHNDHUNIDNIRLITAKORLVALTULUXMDANLDNORPERPRTROUSRBSVKSVNESPSWECHETURUKRARGARMAUSAUTBELBRABGRCANCHLCOLCRIHRVCZEDNKDOMECUFINFRADEUGTMHNDHUNIDNIRLITAKORLVALTULUXMDANLDNORPERPRTROUSRBSVKSVNESPSWECHETURUKROECD_AVGOECD_AVGAPAC_AVGAPAC_AVGEU27_AVGEU27_AVGEurasia_AVGEurasia_AVGLAC_AVGLAC_AVGSE_Europe_AVGSE_Europe_AVGBESTBESTALL_AVGALL_AVGOECD_ACC_AVGOECD_ACC_AVGOECD_PARTNER_AVGOECD_PARTNER_AVG
55.994.126.573.547.158.891.247.161.876.573.588.276.541.258.870.658.858.885.358.852.988.241.235.373.558.894.194.164.710067.644.170.682.494.197.182.491.288.258.835.355.997.155.994.126.573.547.158.891.247.161.876.573.588.276.541.258.870.658.858.885.358.852.988.241.235.373.558.894.194.164.710067.744.170.682.494.197.182.491.288.258.835.355.997.165.865.842.242.274.374.397.197.163.863.892.792.710010069.169.171.471.478.778.7

List of indicators for Integrity of the justice and disciplinary systems

Click on an indicator to see the criteria that are used to calculate it.

Top performing and underperforming criteria in Chile

This table shows the criteria within this dataset where the selected country performs the most above and below average. OECD countries are compared to the OECD average and partner countries are compared to the partner country average. Only criteria fulfilled by less than 40% of countries are shown as leading, and only criteria fulfilled by more than 40% of countries are shown as lagging.

The law establishes specific disciplinary procedures for judges at the first and second instances of the disciplinary process ensuring the right of the defence to be heard and the right to appeal.

55%

of OECD countries fulfill

38%

of OECD partner and accession countries fulfill

Lagging

The law establishes that the transfer of judges is only permitted with their consent or upon their request, except for specific reasons grounded in law and transfer decisions should be taken on the basis of pre-determined criteria.

55%

of OECD countries fulfill

38%

of OECD partner and accession countries fulfill

Lagging

Regulations establish objective criteria and procedures for re-allocation of cases to prosecutors.

13%

of OECD countries fulfill

9%

of OECD partner and accession countries fulfill

Leading

Regulations establish the right to appeal a disciplinary decision in front of a judicial body after exhausting the administrative remedies.

63%

of OECD countries fulfill

38%

of OECD partner and accession countries fulfill

Lagging

Staff handling reports in public prosecutors’ offices undergo mandatory training on confidentiality.

21%

of OECD countries fulfill

3%

of OECD partner and accession countries fulfill

Leading

Aggregated data on (a) the number the number of cases that reached trial, (b) the number of appeals, (c) the number and type of sanctions applied.

29%

of OECD countries fulfill

3%

of OECD partner and accession countries fulfill

Leading