Germany
OECD member since 1960
This set of indicators covers countries’ strategic frameworks on anti-corruption. These could consist of a single strategy or be spread across multiple strategies, but all strategies must be adopted at the highest level of government (council of ministers/cabinet, president or parliament/congress). Data for OECD members was published in 2021 and 2024 with information relating to 2020 and 2023, respectively. Data for non-OECD countries was published in 2024, with information relating to 2023.
| ARG | ARG | ARM | AUS | AUT | AUT | AUT | BOL | BIH | BRA | BRA | BRA | BGR | CAN | CAN | CHL | CHL | CHL | COL | COL | CRI | CRI | CRI | HRV | CZE | CZE | DNK | DNK | DOM | ECU | EST | FIN | FIN | FRA | DEU | GRC | GRC | GTM | HND | HUN | HUN | ISL | ISL | IDN | IRL | JPN | JOR | KOR | XKX | LVA | LVA | LTU | LTU | LTU | MEX | MEX | MEX | MDA | MAR | NLD | NLD | NOR | NOR | NOR | PRY | PER | PER | POL | PRT | PRT | ROU | ROU | SRB | SYC | SVK | SVK | ESP | ESP | SWE | SWE | SWE | CHE | CHE | TUR | TUR | TUR | UKR | GBR | USA | USA | USA | ZMB | ARG | ARM | AUS | AUT | BOL | BIH | BRA | BGR | CAN | CHL | COL | CRI | HRV | CZE | DNK | DOM | ECU | EST | FIN | FRA | DEU | GRC | GTM | HND | HUN | ISL | IDN | IRL | JPN | JOR | KOR | XKX | LVA | LTU | MEX | MDA | MAR | NLD | NOR | PRY | PER | POL | PRT | ROU | SRB | SYC | SVK | ESP | SWE | CHE | TUR | UKR | GBR | USA | ZMB | OECD_AVG | OECD_AVG | OECD_AVG | OECD_AVG | OECD_AVG | APAC_AVG | APAC_AVG | APAC_AVG | EU27_AVG | EU27_AVG | EU27_AVG | EU27_AVG | EU27_AVG | Eurasia_AVG | Eurasia_AVG | LAC_AVG | LAC_AVG | LAC_AVG | LAC_AVG | MEA_AVG | MEA_AVG | SE_Europe_AVG | SE_Europe_AVG | SE_Europe_AVG | SE_Europe_AVG | BEST | BEST | BEST | BEST | BEST | ALL_AVG | ALL_AVG | ALL_AVG | ALL_AVG | ALL_AVG | OECD_ACC_AVG | OECD_ACC_AVG | OECD_ACC_AVG | OECD_ACC_AVG | OECD_PARTNER_AVG | OECD_PARTNER_AVG | OECD_PARTNER_AVG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 71.4 | 100 | 85.7 | 42.9 | 85.7 | 85.7 | 57.1 | 57.1 | 57.1 | 71.4 | 85.7 | 71.4 | 85.7 | 0 | 0 | 85.7 | 85.7 | 0 | 71.4 | 100 | 57.1 | 57.1 | 57.1 | 42.9 | 85.7 | 100 | 14.3 | 14.3 | 0 | 71.4 | 71.4 | 71.4 | 28.6 | 100 | 28.6 | 57.1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 85.7 | 100 | 0 | 0 | 85.7 | 0 | 14.3 | 14.3 | 42.9 | 14.3 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 85.7 | 85.7 | 42.9 | 85.7 | 42.9 | 14.3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 42.9 | 71.4 | 71.4 | 85.7 | 85.7 | 85.7 | 100 | 71.4 | 57.1 | 0 | 85.7 | 85.7 | 85.7 | 0 | 42.9 | 71.4 | 14.3 | 57.1 | 0 | 57.1 | 0 | 57.1 | 71.4 | 85.7 | 71.4 | 71.4 | 71.4 | 71.4 | 71.4 | 85.7 | 42.9 | 85.7 | 57.1 | 57.1 | 85.7 | 85.7 | 0 | 85.7 | 71.4 | 57.1 | 42.9 | 85.7 | 14.3 | 0 | 71.4 | 71.4 | 71.4 | 100 | 28.6 | 57.1 | 0 | 0 | 85.7 | 0 | 85.7 | 0 | 14.3 | 14.3 | 42.9 | 14.3 | 100 | 100 | 85.7 | 42.9 | 85.7 | 42.9 | 0 | 42.9 | 71.4 | 85.7 | 85.7 | 100 | 57.1 | 0 | 85.7 | 85.7 | 71.4 | 57.1 | 0 | 71.4 | 85.7 | 71.4 | 71.4 | 49 | 57.8 | 78.6 | 64.3 | 58.5 | 33.3 | 85.7 | 46.4 | 58 | 67 | 78.6 | 90.5 | 70.7 | 66.7 | 66.7 | 69.4 | 52.4 | 77.1 | 53.8 | 42.9 | 42.9 | 71.4 | 60.7 | 57.1 | 59.5 | 100 | 100 | 85.7 | 100 | 100 | 52.5 | 54.8 | 67.9 | 66.2 | 56.1 | 78.6 | 75.5 | 85.7 | 77.6 | 39.8 | 57.1 | 42 |
List of indicators for Quality of strategic framework
Click on an indicator to see the criteria that are used to calculate it.
Top performing and underperforming criteria in Germany
This table shows the criteria within this dataset where the selected country performs the most above and below average. OECD countries are compared to the OECD average and partner countries are compared to the partner country average. Only criteria fulfilled by less than 40% of countries are shown as leading, and only criteria fulfilled by more than 40% of countries are shown as lagging.
Strategies for any of the following sectors have at least one first-level objective aimed at mitigating public integrity risks: (a) infrastructure, (b) housing, (c) health, (d) education, (e) taxation, (f) customs. | 11% of OECD countries fulfill | 13% of OECD partner and accession countries fulfill | Leading | |
No funding shortfalls or budget reductions against the approved action plan have been reported by the implementing authorities or in the monitoring reports. | 26% of OECD countries fulfill | 16% of OECD partner and accession countries fulfill | Leading | |
Strategic objectives are established for reducing fraud and other types of corruption across the public sector. | 32% of OECD countries fulfill | 25% of OECD partner and accession countries fulfill | Leading | |
For each strategy, there is a central coordination function responsible for coordinating the implementation, monitoring, reporting, and evaluation of the action plan. | 58% of OECD countries fulfill | 56% of OECD partner and accession countries fulfill | Lagging | |
All public integrity strategies have an action plan in force. | 53% of OECD countries fulfill | 50% of OECD partner and accession countries fulfill | Lagging | |
At least one strategy refers to at least one international legal instrument relating to public integrity. | 50% of OECD countries fulfill | 50% of OECD partner and accession countries fulfill | Lagging |
Within the last five years, an inter-institutional body has prepared and published an analytical report on public integrity risks that formulates recommendations and sets priorities for the whole public integrity system. | 11% of OECD countries fulfill | 9% of OECD partner and accession countries fulfill | ||
Each existing strategy is based on an assessment of public integrity risks, identifying as a minimum specific types of relevant integrity breaches, the actors likely to be involved, as well as the expected likelihood and impact if the risk materialises. | 16% of OECD countries fulfill | 6% of OECD partner and accession countries fulfill | ||
Each existing strategy refers to at least 4 out of the following 8 sources of information related to public integrity: (a) indicators from international organisations or research institutions, (b) employee surveys, (c) household surveys, (d) business surveys, (e) other survey data, such as user surveys, or polls from local research institutions, (f) data from public registries (e.g. law enforcement, audit institutions, national statistics office), (g) published research documents from national or international organisations or academia (e.g. articles, reports, working papers, political economy analysis) and (h) commissioned research. | 32% of OECD countries fulfill | 22% of OECD partner and accession countries fulfill |