OECD Public Integrity IndicatorsHome

Finland

OECD member since 1969

This set of indicators covers regulations and practice aimed at promoting integrity in the justice system and ensuring accountability through the disciplinary system for civil servants. Data for both OECD members and non-OECD members will be released in 2025.

Regulatory framework for judicial integrity
ARGARMAUSAUTBELBRABGRCANCHLCOLCRIHRVCZEDNKDOMECUFINFRADEUGTMHNDHUNIDNIRLITAKORLVALTULUXMDANLDNORPERPRTROUSRBSVKSVNESPSWECHETURUKRARGARMAUSAUTBELBRABGRCANCHLCOLCRIHRVCZEDNKDOMECUFINFRADEUGTMHNDHUNIDNIRLITAKORLVALTULUXMDANLDNORPERPRTROUSRBSVKSVNESPSWECHETURUKROECD_AVGOECD_AVGAPAC_AVGAPAC_AVGEU27_AVGEU27_AVGEurasia_AVGEurasia_AVGLAC_AVGLAC_AVGSE_Europe_AVGSE_Europe_AVGBESTBESTALL_AVGALL_AVGOECD_ACC_AVGOECD_ACC_AVGOECD_PARTNER_AVGOECD_PARTNER_AVG
55.994.126.573.547.158.891.247.161.876.573.588.276.541.258.870.658.858.885.358.852.988.241.235.373.558.894.194.164.710067.644.170.682.494.197.182.491.288.258.835.355.997.155.994.126.573.547.158.891.247.161.876.573.588.276.541.258.870.658.858.885.358.852.988.241.235.373.558.894.194.164.710067.744.170.682.494.197.182.491.288.258.835.355.997.165.865.842.242.274.374.397.197.163.863.892.792.710010069.169.171.471.478.778.7

List of indicators for Integrity of the justice and disciplinary systems

Click on an indicator to see the criteria that are used to calculate it.

Top performing and underperforming criteria in Finland

This table shows the criteria within this dataset where the selected country performs the most above and below average. OECD countries are compared to the OECD average and partner countries are compared to the partner country average. Only criteria fulfilled by less than 40% of countries are shown as leading, and only criteria fulfilled by more than 40% of countries are shown as lagging.

Standards of conduct and ethical behaviour are published and applicable to all judges.

61%

of OECD countries fulfill

44%

of OECD partner and accession countries fulfill

Lagging

Regulations establish that staff in charge of the investigation, decision, and appeal cannot be removed from office before the completion of their assigned disciplinary cases, and the grounds for their dismissal are established in the regulatory framework.

3%

of OECD countries fulfill

6%

of OECD partner and accession countries fulfill

Leading

Staff in charge of investigating and deciding on disciplinary cases are obliged to inform the judiciary or law enforcement if a disciplinary case involves criminal behaviour.

61%

of OECD countries fulfill

44%

of OECD partner and accession countries fulfill

Lagging

Standards of conduct and ethical behaviour are publicly available online.

61%

of OECD countries fulfill

44%

of OECD partner and accession countries fulfill

Lagging

Staff handling reports in courts undergo mandatory training on confidentiality.

8%

of OECD countries fulfill

0%

of OECD partner and accession countries fulfill

Leading

The electronic case management system for disciplinary cases and proceedings allows for documentation.

13%

of OECD countries fulfill

9%

of OECD partner and accession countries fulfill

Leading