Japan
OECD member since 1964
This set of indicators covers countries’ strategic frameworks on anti-corruption. These could consist of a single strategy or be spread across multiple strategies, but all strategies must be adopted at the highest level of government (council of ministers/cabinet, president or parliament/congress). Data for OECD members was published in 2021 and 2024 with information relating to 2020 and 2023, respectively. Data for non-OECD countries was published in 2024, with information relating to 2023.
| ARG | ARG | ARM | AUS | AUT | AUT | AUT | BOL | BIH | BRA | BRA | BRA | BGR | CAN | CAN | CHL | CHL | CHL | COL | COL | CRI | CRI | CRI | HRV | CZE | CZE | DNK | DNK | DOM | ECU | EST | FIN | FIN | FRA | DEU | GRC | GRC | GTM | HND | HUN | HUN | ISL | ISL | IDN | IRL | JPN | JOR | KOR | XKX | LVA | LVA | LTU | LTU | LTU | MEX | MEX | MEX | MDA | MAR | NLD | NLD | NOR | NOR | NOR | PRY | PER | PER | POL | PRT | PRT | ROU | ROU | SRB | SYC | SVK | SVK | ESP | ESP | SWE | SWE | SWE | CHE | CHE | TUR | TUR | TUR | UKR | GBR | USA | USA | USA | ZMB | ARG | ARM | AUS | AUT | BOL | BIH | BRA | BGR | CAN | CHL | COL | CRI | HRV | CZE | DNK | DOM | ECU | EST | FIN | FRA | DEU | GRC | GTM | HND | HUN | ISL | IDN | IRL | JPN | JOR | KOR | XKX | LVA | LTU | MEX | MDA | MAR | NLD | NOR | PRY | PER | POL | PRT | ROU | SRB | SYC | SVK | ESP | SWE | CHE | TUR | UKR | GBR | USA | ZMB | OECD_AVG | OECD_AVG | OECD_AVG | OECD_AVG | OECD_AVG | APAC_AVG | APAC_AVG | APAC_AVG | EU27_AVG | EU27_AVG | EU27_AVG | EU27_AVG | EU27_AVG | Eurasia_AVG | Eurasia_AVG | LAC_AVG | LAC_AVG | LAC_AVG | LAC_AVG | MEA_AVG | MEA_AVG | SE_Europe_AVG | SE_Europe_AVG | SE_Europe_AVG | SE_Europe_AVG | BEST | BEST | BEST | BEST | BEST | ALL_AVG | ALL_AVG | ALL_AVG | ALL_AVG | ALL_AVG | OECD_ACC_AVG | OECD_ACC_AVG | OECD_ACC_AVG | OECD_ACC_AVG | OECD_PARTNER_AVG | OECD_PARTNER_AVG | OECD_PARTNER_AVG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 71.4 | 100 | 85.7 | 42.9 | 85.7 | 85.7 | 57.1 | 57.1 | 57.1 | 71.4 | 85.7 | 71.4 | 85.7 | 0 | 0 | 85.7 | 85.7 | 0 | 71.4 | 100 | 57.1 | 57.1 | 57.1 | 42.9 | 85.7 | 100 | 14.3 | 14.3 | 0 | 71.4 | 71.4 | 71.4 | 28.6 | 100 | 28.6 | 57.1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 85.7 | 100 | 0 | 0 | 85.7 | 0 | 14.3 | 14.3 | 42.9 | 14.3 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 85.7 | 85.7 | 42.9 | 85.7 | 42.9 | 14.3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 42.9 | 71.4 | 71.4 | 85.7 | 85.7 | 85.7 | 100 | 71.4 | 57.1 | 0 | 85.7 | 85.7 | 85.7 | 0 | 42.9 | 71.4 | 14.3 | 57.1 | 0 | 57.1 | 0 | 57.1 | 71.4 | 85.7 | 71.4 | 71.4 | 71.4 | 71.4 | 71.4 | 85.7 | 42.9 | 85.7 | 57.1 | 57.1 | 85.7 | 85.7 | 0 | 85.7 | 71.4 | 57.1 | 42.9 | 85.7 | 14.3 | 0 | 71.4 | 71.4 | 71.4 | 100 | 28.6 | 57.1 | 0 | 0 | 85.7 | 0 | 85.7 | 0 | 14.3 | 14.3 | 42.9 | 14.3 | 100 | 100 | 85.7 | 42.9 | 85.7 | 42.9 | 0 | 42.9 | 71.4 | 85.7 | 85.7 | 100 | 57.1 | 0 | 85.7 | 85.7 | 71.4 | 57.1 | 0 | 71.4 | 85.7 | 71.4 | 71.4 | 49 | 57.8 | 78.6 | 64.3 | 58.5 | 33.3 | 85.7 | 46.4 | 58 | 67 | 78.6 | 90.5 | 70.7 | 66.7 | 66.7 | 69.4 | 52.4 | 77.1 | 53.8 | 42.9 | 42.9 | 71.4 | 60.7 | 57.1 | 59.5 | 100 | 100 | 85.7 | 100 | 100 | 52.5 | 54.8 | 67.9 | 66.2 | 56.1 | 78.6 | 75.5 | 85.7 | 77.6 | 39.8 | 57.1 | 42 |
List of indicators for Quality of strategic framework
Click on an indicator to see the criteria that are used to calculate it.
Top performing and underperforming criteria in Japan
This table shows the criteria within this dataset where the selected country performs the most above and below average. OECD countries are compared to the OECD average and partner countries are compared to the partner country average. Only criteria fulfilled by less than 40% of countries are shown as leading, and only criteria fulfilled by more than 40% of countries are shown as lagging.
No funding shortfalls or budget reductions against the approved action plan have been reported by the implementing authorities or in the monitoring reports. | 26% of OECD countries fulfill | 16% of OECD partner and accession countries fulfill | Leading | |
Strategic objectives are established for mitigating public integrity risks in public procurement. | 29% of OECD countries fulfill | 16% of OECD partner and accession countries fulfill | Leading | |
For each strategy, there is a central coordination function responsible for coordinating the implementation, monitoring, reporting, and evaluation of the action plan. | 58% of OECD countries fulfill | 56% of OECD partner and accession countries fulfill | Lagging | |
At least one key integrity body has been consulted and provided inputs through the regular inter-institutional or public consultation procedures to at least one of the existing public integrity strategies. | 53% of OECD countries fulfill | 56% of OECD partner and accession countries fulfill | Lagging | |
All public integrity strategies have an action plan in force. | 53% of OECD countries fulfill | 50% of OECD partner and accession countries fulfill | Lagging |