OECD Public Integrity IndicatorsHome

Lithuania

OECD member since 2018

This set of indicators covers regulations and practice aimed at promoting integrity in the justice system and ensuring accountability through the disciplinary system for civil servants. Data for both OECD members and non-OECD members will be released in 2025.

Regulatory framework for judicial integrity
ARGARMAUSAUTBELBRABGRCANCHLCOLCRIHRVCZEDNKDOMECUFINFRADEUGTMHNDHUNIDNIRLITAKORLVALTULUXMDANLDNORPERPRTROUSRBSVKSVNESPSWECHETURUKRARGARMAUSAUTBELBRABGRCANCHLCOLCRIHRVCZEDNKDOMECUFINFRADEUGTMHNDHUNIDNIRLITAKORLVALTULUXMDANLDNORPERPRTROUSRBSVKSVNESPSWECHETURUKROECD_AVGOECD_AVGAPAC_AVGAPAC_AVGEU27_AVGEU27_AVGEurasia_AVGEurasia_AVGLAC_AVGLAC_AVGSE_Europe_AVGSE_Europe_AVGBESTBESTALL_AVGALL_AVGOECD_ACC_AVGOECD_ACC_AVGOECD_PARTNER_AVGOECD_PARTNER_AVG
55.994.126.573.547.158.891.247.161.876.573.588.276.541.258.870.658.858.885.358.852.988.241.235.373.558.894.194.164.710067.644.170.682.494.197.182.491.288.258.835.355.997.155.994.126.573.547.158.891.247.161.876.573.588.276.541.258.870.658.858.885.358.852.988.241.235.373.558.894.194.164.710067.744.170.682.494.197.182.491.288.258.835.355.997.165.865.842.242.274.374.397.197.163.863.892.792.710010069.169.171.471.478.778.7

List of indicators for Integrity of the justice and disciplinary systems

Click on an indicator to see the criteria that are used to calculate it.

Top performing and underperforming criteria in Lithuania

This table shows the criteria within this dataset where the selected country performs the most above and below average. OECD countries are compared to the OECD average and partner countries are compared to the partner country average. Only criteria fulfilled by less than 40% of countries are shown as leading, and only criteria fulfilled by more than 40% of countries are shown as lagging.

Regulations define the circumstances and relationships that can lead to conflict-of-interest situations for court employees.

Data to be improved

55%

of OECD countries fulfill

25%

of OECD partner and accession countries fulfill

Lagging

Regulations establish rules governing the introduction of evidence in disciplinary proceedings.

50%

of OECD countries fulfill

28%

of OECD partner and accession countries fulfill

Lagging

The law establishes that a judge’s assessment of facts and weighing of evidence during a case cannot serve as grounds for any disciplinary action, except in the case of malice or gross negligence.

42%

of OECD countries fulfill

31%

of OECD partner and accession countries fulfill

Lagging

The submission rate of interest declarations from the highest members of prosecutorial authorities is at least 80% for the past four years.

16%

of OECD countries fulfill

19%

of OECD partner and accession countries fulfill

Leading

Staff handling reports in public prosecutors’ offices undergo mandatory training on confidentiality.

21%

of OECD countries fulfill

3%

of OECD partner and accession countries fulfill

Leading

Government portals or websites allow filtering by type of criminal corruption offense

24%

of OECD countries fulfill

6%

of OECD partner and accession countries fulfill

Leading