OECD Public Integrity IndicatorsHome

Luxembourg

OECD member since 1960

This set of indicators covers regulations and practice aimed at promoting integrity in the justice system and ensuring accountability through the disciplinary system for civil servants. Data for both OECD members and non-OECD members will be released in 2025.

Regulatory framework for judicial integrity
ARGARMAUSAUTBELBRABGRCANCHLCOLCRIHRVCZEDNKDOMECUFINFRADEUGTMHNDHUNIDNIRLITAKORLVALTULUXMDANLDNORPERPRTROUSRBSVKSVNESPSWECHETURUKRARGARMAUSAUTBELBRABGRCANCHLCOLCRIHRVCZEDNKDOMECUFINFRADEUGTMHNDHUNIDNIRLITAKORLVALTULUXMDANLDNORPERPRTROUSRBSVKSVNESPSWECHETURUKROECD_AVGOECD_AVGAPAC_AVGAPAC_AVGEU27_AVGEU27_AVGEurasia_AVGEurasia_AVGLAC_AVGLAC_AVGSE_Europe_AVGSE_Europe_AVGBESTBESTALL_AVGALL_AVGOECD_ACC_AVGOECD_ACC_AVGOECD_PARTNER_AVGOECD_PARTNER_AVG
55.994.126.573.547.158.891.247.161.876.573.588.276.541.258.870.658.858.885.358.852.988.241.235.373.558.894.194.164.710067.644.170.682.494.197.182.491.288.258.835.355.997.155.994.126.573.547.158.891.247.161.876.573.588.276.541.258.870.658.858.885.358.852.988.241.235.373.558.894.194.164.710067.744.170.682.494.197.182.491.288.258.835.355.997.165.865.842.242.274.374.397.197.163.863.892.792.710010069.169.171.471.478.778.7

List of indicators for Integrity of the justice and disciplinary systems

Click on an indicator to see the criteria that are used to calculate it.

Top performing and underperforming criteria in Luxembourg

This table shows the criteria within this dataset where the selected country performs the most above and below average. OECD countries are compared to the OECD average and partner countries are compared to the partner country average. Only criteria fulfilled by less than 40% of countries are shown as leading, and only criteria fulfilled by more than 40% of countries are shown as lagging.

Regulations establish that the budget of the judiciary is approved directly by the parliament.

Data to be improved

55%

of OECD countries fulfill

44%

of OECD partner and accession countries fulfill

Lagging

All central government bodies use an electronic case management system to manage disciplinary cases and proceedings.

16%

of OECD countries fulfill

9%

of OECD partner and accession countries fulfill

Leading

The law requires those receiving whistleblower complaints in the judiciary to acknowledge receipt of reports, provide follow-up and feedback on the outcome, and forward to relevant authorities.

32%

of OECD countries fulfill

19%

of OECD partner and accession countries fulfill

Leading

Regulations establish that disciplinary proceedings of prosecutors, including dismissal procedures to remove prosecutors from office, are decided by an independent body or a court.

32%

of OECD countries fulfill

19%

of OECD partner and accession countries fulfill

Leading

Public prosecution offices publish performance reports at least every two years.

61%

of OECD countries fulfill

44%

of OECD partner and accession countries fulfill

Lagging

The law establishes that public prosecutors offices submit reports on the performance of the office to the Parliament, the Ministry of Justice or the Supreme Court.

58%

of OECD countries fulfill

41%

of OECD partner and accession countries fulfill

Lagging