OECD Public Integrity IndicatorsHome
CountriesDatasetsAbout

Latvia

OECD member since 2016

This set of indicators covers countries’ strategic frameworks on anti-corruption. These could consist of a single strategy or be spread across multiple strategies, but all strategies must be adopted at the highest level of government (council of ministers/cabinet, president or parliament/congress). Data for OECD members was published in 2021 and 2024 with information relating to 2020 and 2023, respectively. Data for non-OECD countries was published in 2024, with information relating to 2023.

Regulatory framework for internal control
ARGAUSAUTBRACANCHLCRICZEDNKESTFINFRAGRCIRLJPNKORLVALTULUXMEXNLDNORPERPOLPRTSVKSVNESPSWETURUKRUSAARGAUSAUTBRACANCHLCRICZEDNKESTFINFRAGRCIRLJPNKORLVALTULUXMEXNLDNORPERPOLPRTSVKSVNESPSWETURUKRUSAOECD_AVGOECD_AVGAPAC_AVGAPAC_AVGEU27_AVGEU27_AVGEurasia_AVGEurasia_AVGLAC_AVGLAC_AVGBESTBESTBESTALL_AVGALL_AVGALL_AVGOECD_ACC_AVGOECD_ACC_AVGOECD_PARTNER_AVGOECD_PARTNER_AVG
9070409010070100605010090901009030807010040100100100408080801001001004070100907040901007010060501009090100903080701004010010010040808080100100100407010080.780.7606081.781.7707081.781.710070100807079.773.373.37070

List of indicators for Effectiveness of internal control and risk management

Click on an indicator to see the criteria that are used to calculate it.

Top performing and underperforming criteria in Latvia

This table shows the criteria within this dataset where the selected country performs the most above and below average. OECD countries are compared to the OECD average and partner countries are compared to the partner country average. Only criteria fulfilled by less than 40% of countries are shown as leading, and only criteria fulfilled by more than 40% of countries are shown as lagging.

An intergovernmental organisation has conducted a review of the IC or IA system within the past 5 years.

11%

of OECD countries fulfill

9%

of OECD partner and accession countries fulfill

Leading

The IA function has reviewed the adequacy and effectiveness of the risk management policies and processes for all public sector bodies within the past 3 years.

11%

of OECD countries fulfill

0%

of OECD partner and accession countries fulfill

Leading

IA units are staffed according to legal requirements.

13%

of OECD countries fulfill

3%

of OECD partner and accession countries fulfill

Leading

Standards of conduct and ethical behaviour are published and applicable for ministers.

63%

of OECD countries fulfill

9%

of OECD partner and accession countries fulfill

Lagging

Standards of conduct and ethical behaviour are published and applicable for other political appointees.

53%

of OECD countries fulfill

9%

of OECD partner and accession countries fulfill

Lagging

A central function develops the IC system.

50%

of OECD countries fulfill

9%

of OECD partner and accession countries fulfill

Lagging

A risk management framework exists.

63%

of OECD countries fulfill

9%

of OECD partner and accession countries fulfill

Public integrity risks are explicitly addressed in the risk management framework.

55%

of OECD countries fulfill

9%

of OECD partner and accession countries fulfill

The risk management framework explicitly delegates responsibility for conducting risk assessments to management, not internal auditors.

61%

of OECD countries fulfill

9%

of OECD partner and accession countries fulfill

Entity-wide risk registers or fraud risk profiles must be prepared in each public body.

47%

of OECD countries fulfill

6%

of OECD partner and accession countries fulfill

Lagging

Processes and procedures are established for addressing the risks and actions that management must take, including reporting procedures or addressing weaknesses in the internal control system.

50%

of OECD countries fulfill

6%

of OECD partner and accession countries fulfill