OECD Public Integrity IndicatorsHome

Mexico

OECD member since 1994

This set of indicators covers regulations and practice aimed at promoting integrity in the justice system and ensuring accountability through the disciplinary system for civil servants. Data for both OECD members and non-OECD members will be released in 2025.

Regulatory framework for judicial integrity
ARGARMAUSAUTBELBRABGRCANCHLCOLCRIHRVCZEDNKDOMECUFINFRADEUGTMHNDHUNIDNIRLITAKORLVALTULUXMDANLDNORPERPRTROUSRBSVKSVNESPSWECHETURUKRARGARMAUSAUTBELBRABGRCANCHLCOLCRIHRVCZEDNKDOMECUFINFRADEUGTMHNDHUNIDNIRLITAKORLVALTULUXMDANLDNORPERPRTROUSRBSVKSVNESPSWECHETURUKROECD_AVGOECD_AVGAPAC_AVGAPAC_AVGEU27_AVGEU27_AVGEurasia_AVGEurasia_AVGLAC_AVGLAC_AVGSE_Europe_AVGSE_Europe_AVGBESTBESTALL_AVGALL_AVGOECD_ACC_AVGOECD_ACC_AVGOECD_PARTNER_AVGOECD_PARTNER_AVG
55.994.126.573.547.158.891.247.161.876.573.588.276.541.258.870.658.858.885.358.852.988.241.235.373.558.894.194.164.710067.644.170.682.494.197.182.491.288.258.835.355.997.155.994.126.573.547.158.891.247.161.876.573.588.276.541.258.870.658.858.885.358.852.988.241.235.373.558.894.194.164.710067.744.170.682.494.197.182.491.288.258.835.355.997.165.865.842.242.274.374.397.197.163.863.892.792.710010069.169.171.471.478.778.7

List of indicators for Integrity of the justice and disciplinary systems

Click on an indicator to see the criteria that are used to calculate it.

Top performing and underperforming criteria in Mexico

This table shows the criteria within this dataset where the selected country performs the most above and below average. OECD countries are compared to the OECD average and partner countries are compared to the partner country average. Only criteria fulfilled by less than 40% of countries are shown as leading, and only criteria fulfilled by more than 40% of countries are shown as lagging.

Staff in charge of investigating and deciding on disciplinary cases are obliged to inform the judiciary or law enforcement if a disciplinary case involves criminal behaviour.

61%

of OECD countries fulfill

44%

of OECD partner and accession countries fulfill

Lagging

Regulations require that all prosecutorial vacancies are public.

53%

of OECD countries fulfill

31%

of OECD partner and accession countries fulfill

Lagging

Regulations require that prosecutorial authorities are consulted in determining the allocation of resources and this allocation is done according to publicly available criteria.

47%

of OECD countries fulfill

38%

of OECD partner and accession countries fulfill

Lagging

The electronic case management system for disciplinary cases and proceedings allows for documentation.

13%

of OECD countries fulfill

9%

of OECD partner and accession countries fulfill

Leading

All central government bodies use an electronic case management system to manage disciplinary cases and proceedings.

16%

of OECD countries fulfill

9%

of OECD partner and accession countries fulfill

Leading

All staff conducting disciplinary investigations are offered a training programme on how to conduct these investigations.

29%

of OECD countries fulfill

13%

of OECD partner and accession countries fulfill

Leading