Peru
OECD accession country since 2022; adherent to the Recommendation on Public Integrity since 2020
This set of indicators covers countries’ strategic frameworks on anti-corruption. These could consist of a single strategy or be spread across multiple strategies, but all strategies must be adopted at the highest level of government (council of ministers/cabinet, president or parliament/congress). Data for OECD members was published in 2021 and 2024 with information relating to 2020 and 2023, respectively. Data for non-OECD countries was published in 2024, with information relating to 2023.
| ARG | ARG | ARM | AUS | AUT | AUT | BOL | BIH | BRA | BRA | BGR | CAN | CAN | CHL | CHL | COL | CRI | CRI | HRV | CZE | CZE | DNK | DNK | DOM | ECU | EST | FIN | FIN | FRA | GRC | GRC | GTM | HND | HUN | HUN | ISL | ISL | IDN | IRL | JPN | JOR | KAZ | KOR | XKX | LVA | LVA | LTU | LTU | MEX | MEX | MDA | MAR | NLD | NLD | NOR | NOR | PRY | PER | PER | POL | PRT | PRT | ROU | ROU | SRB | SYC | SVK | SVK | ESP | SWE | SWE | SWE | CHE | CHE | TUR | TUR | UKR | GBR | USA | USA | ZMB | ARG | ARM | AUS | AUT | BOL | BIH | BRA | BGR | CAN | CHL | COL | CRI | HRV | CZE | DNK | DOM | ECU | EST | FIN | FRA | GRC | GTM | HND | HUN | ISL | IDN | IRL | JPN | JOR | KAZ | KOR | XKX | LVA | LTU | MEX | MDA | MAR | NLD | NOR | PRY | PER | POL | PRT | ROU | SRB | SYC | SVK | ESP | SWE | CHE | TUR | UKR | GBR | USA | ZMB | OECD_AVG | OECD_AVG | OECD_AVG | OECD_AVG | APAC_AVG | APAC_AVG | APAC_AVG | EU27_AVG | EU27_AVG | EU27_AVG | EU27_AVG | Eurasia_AVG | Eurasia_AVG | LAC_AVG | LAC_AVG | LAC_AVG | MEA_AVG | MEA_AVG | SE_Europe_AVG | SE_Europe_AVG | SE_Europe_AVG | SE_Europe_AVG | BEST | BEST | BEST | BEST | ALL_AVG | ALL_AVG | ALL_AVG | ALL_AVG | OECD_ACC_AVG | OECD_ACC_AVG | OECD_ACC_AVG | OECD_PARTNER_AVG | OECD_PARTNER_AVG | OECD_PARTNER_AVG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 71.4 | 100 | 85.7 | 42.9 | 85.7 | 57.1 | 57.1 | 57.1 | 71.4 | 71.4 | 85.7 | 0 | 0 | 85.7 | 0 | 100 | 57.1 | 57.1 | 42.9 | 85.7 | 100 | 14.3 | 14.3 | 0 | 71.4 | 71.4 | 71.4 | 28.6 | 100 | 57.1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 85.7 | 100 | 0 | 0 | 85.7 | 0 | 14.3 | 14.3 | 57.1 | 42.9 | 14.3 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 85.7 | 42.9 | 85.7 | 42.9 | 14.3 | 0 | 0 | 42.9 | 71.4 | 71.4 | 85.7 | 85.7 | 85.7 | 100 | 71.4 | 57.1 | 0 | 85.7 | 85.7 | 0 | 42.9 | 71.4 | 14.3 | 57.1 | 0 | 57.1 | 57.1 | 71.4 | 85.7 | 71.4 | 71.4 | 71.4 | 71.4 | 85.7 | 42.9 | 85.7 | 57.1 | 57.1 | 71.4 | 85.7 | 0 | 85.7 | 100 | 57.1 | 42.9 | 85.7 | 14.3 | 0 | 71.4 | 71.4 | 71.4 | 100 | 57.1 | 0 | 0 | 85.7 | 0 | 85.7 | 0 | 14.3 | 14.3 | 57.1 | 42.9 | 14.3 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 42.9 | 85.7 | 42.9 | 0 | 42.9 | 71.4 | 85.7 | 85.7 | 100 | 57.1 | 0 | 85.7 | 0 | 71.4 | 57.1 | 57.1 | 71.4 | 85.7 | 71.4 | 71.4 | 49.8 | 57.8 | 78.6 | 59.9 | 33.3 | 85.7 | 46.4 | 59.8 | 67 | 78.6 | 68.6 | 64.3 | 64.3 | 69.4 | 52.4 | 56 | 42.9 | 42.9 | 71.4 | 60.7 | 57.1 | 59.5 | 100 | 100 | 85.7 | 100 | 53.2 | 54.9 | 67.9 | 56.6 | 78.6 | 75.5 | 75.5 | 41 | 57.1 | 42.9 |
List of indicators for Quality of strategic framework
Click on an indicator to see the criteria that are used to calculate it.
Top performing and underperforming criteria in Peru
This table shows the criteria within this dataset where the selected country performs the most above and below average. OECD countries are compared to the OECD average and partner countries are compared to the partner country average. Only criteria fulfilled by less than 40% of countries are shown as leading, and only criteria fulfilled by more than 40% of countries are shown as lagging.
Each existing strategy is based on an assessment of public integrity risks, identifying as a minimum specific types of relevant integrity breaches, the actors likely to be involved, as well as the expected likelihood and impact if the risk materialises. | 21% of OECD countries fulfill | 13% of OECD partner and accession countries fulfill | Leading | |
Strategies for any of the following sectors have at least one first-level objective aimed at mitigating public integrity risks: (a) infrastructure, (b) housing, (c) health, (d) education, (e) taxation, (f) customs. | 29% of OECD countries fulfill | 34% of OECD partner and accession countries fulfill | Leading | |
Each existing strategy refers to at least 4 out of the following 8 sources of information related to public integrity: (a) indicators from international organisations or research institutions, (b) employee surveys, (c) household surveys, (d) business surveys, (e) other survey data, such as user surveys, or polls from local research institutions, (f) data from public registries (e.g. law enforcement, audit institutions, national statistics office), (g) published research documents from national or international organisations or academia (e.g. articles, reports, working papers, political economy analysis) and (h) commissioned research. | 37% of OECD countries fulfill | 34% of OECD partner and accession countries fulfill | Leading | |
All public integrity strategies have an action plan in force. | 53% of OECD countries fulfill | 53% of OECD partner and accession countries fulfill | Lagging | |
All action plans identify lead organisations at least for each objective. | 47% of OECD countries fulfill | 53% of OECD partner and accession countries fulfill | Lagging | |
All action plans are published as a minimum on the website of the responsible body. | 53% of OECD countries fulfill | 50% of OECD partner and accession countries fulfill | Lagging |
A minimum duration of at least 2 weeks for inter-institutional and public consultation period is established in legislation. | 13% of OECD countries fulfill | 19% of OECD partner and accession countries fulfill | ||
The public consultation portal contains the draft strategy, including all supporting relevant materials. | 24% of OECD countries fulfill | 31% of OECD partner and accession countries fulfill | ||
All public integrity strategies in force have undergone mandatory inter-institutional and public consultation processes. | 32% of OECD countries fulfill | 41% of OECD partner and accession countries fulfill | Lagging | |
At least one public integrity strategy has undergone an extended consultation process. | 42% of OECD countries fulfill | 34% of OECD partner and accession countries fulfill | Leading | |
At least one key integrity body has been consulted and provided inputs through the regular inter-institutional or public consultation procedures to at least one of the existing public integrity strategies. | 50% of OECD countries fulfill | 56% of OECD partner and accession countries fulfill | ||
At least one non-state actor has been a member of a working group mandated to develop or amend public integrity strategies in force. | 42% of OECD countries fulfill | 41% of OECD partner and accession countries fulfill | ||
The public consultation portal contains a summary sheet for all draft strategies with responses to all submitted comments provided during the public consultation. | 13% of OECD countries fulfill | 22% of OECD partner and accession countries fulfill |