Poland
OECD member since 1996
This set of indicators covers countries’ strategic frameworks on anti-corruption. These could consist of a single strategy or be spread across multiple strategies, but all strategies must be adopted at the highest level of government (council of ministers/cabinet, president or parliament/congress). Data for OECD members was published in 2021 and 2024 with information relating to 2020 and 2023, respectively. Data for non-OECD countries was published in 2024, with information relating to 2023.
| ARG | AUS | AUT | BRA | CAN | CHL | CRI | CZE | DNK | EST | FIN | FRA | GRC | IRL | MEX | NLD | NOR | PER | POL | PRT | SVK | SVN | ESP | SWE | TUR | UKR | USA | ARG | AUS | AUT | BRA | CAN | CHL | CRI | CZE | DNK | EST | FIN | FRA | GRC | IRL | MEX | NLD | NOR | PER | POL | PRT | SVK | SVN | ESP | SWE | TUR | UKR | USA | OECD_AVG | OECD_AVG | APAC_AVG | APAC_AVG | EU27_AVG | EU27_AVG | Eurasia_AVG | Eurasia_AVG | LAC_AVG | LAC_AVG | BEST | BEST | BEST | ALL_AVG | ALL_AVG | ALL_AVG | OECD_ACC_AVG | OECD_ACC_AVG | OECD_PARTNER_AVG | OECD_PARTNER_AVG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 90 | 70 | 40 | 90 | 100 | 70 | 100 | 60 | 50 | 100 | 90 | 90 | 100 | 90 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 40 | 80 | 80 | 80 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 40 | 70 | 100 | 90 | 70 | 40 | 90 | 100 | 70 | 100 | 60 | 50 | 100 | 90 | 90 | 100 | 90 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 40 | 80 | 80 | 80 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 40 | 70 | 100 | 84.3 | 84.3 | 70 | 70 | 84 | 84 | 70 | 70 | 81.7 | 81.7 | 100 | 70 | 100 | 83.1 | 70 | 82.6 | 73.3 | 73.3 | 70 | 70 |
List of indicators for Effectiveness of internal control and risk management
Click on an indicator to see the criteria that are used to calculate it.
Top performing and underperforming criteria in Poland
This table shows the criteria within this dataset where the selected country performs the most above and below average. OECD countries are compared to the OECD average and partner countries are compared to the partner country average. Only criteria fulfilled by less than 40% of countries are shown as leading, and only criteria fulfilled by more than 40% of countries are shown as lagging.
Integrity risk assessments for at least half of sample organisations include an examination of existing controls and whether changes are needed in the control environment (i.e. risk treatment). | 8% of OECD countries fulfill | 6% of OECD partner and accession countries fulfill | Leading | |
The annual reports on IC and/or IA from the past 3 years present the rates of implementation of IA recommendations. | 11% of OECD countries fulfill | 6% of OECD partner and accession countries fulfill | Leading | |
The IA function has reviewed the adequacy and effectiveness of the risk management policies and processes for all public sector bodies within the past 3 years. | 11% of OECD countries fulfill | 0% of OECD partner and accession countries fulfill | Leading | |
Standards of conduct and ethical behaviour are published and applicable for ministers. | 63% of OECD countries fulfill | 9% of OECD partner and accession countries fulfill | Lagging | |
Standards of conduct and ethical behaviour are published and applicable for other political appointees. | 53% of OECD countries fulfill | 9% of OECD partner and accession countries fulfill | Lagging | |
Standards directly aimed at the conduct and ethical behaviour of internal auditors are published. | 47% of OECD countries fulfill | 9% of OECD partner and accession countries fulfill | Lagging |
One central government body (CHU) develops the IC and IA systems. | 39% of OECD countries fulfill | 9% of OECD partner and accession countries fulfill | Leading | |
A central function develops the IC system. | 50% of OECD countries fulfill | 9% of OECD partner and accession countries fulfill | ||
A central function develops the IA system. | 50% of OECD countries fulfill | 9% of OECD partner and accession countries fulfill | ||
The CHU promotes IC and IA methodologies based on international standards. | 39% of OECD countries fulfill | 9% of OECD partner and accession countries fulfill | Leading | |
A central function promotes IC methodologies based on international standards. | 50% of OECD countries fulfill | 9% of OECD partner and accession countries fulfill | ||
A central function promotes IA methodologies based on international standards. | 50% of OECD countries fulfill | 9% of OECD partner and accession countries fulfill | ||
The CHU has conducted a government-wide review on the IC and IA systems, annually during the last 3 years. | 26% of OECD countries fulfill | 6% of OECD partner and accession countries fulfill | ||
The central function has conducted a government-wide review of the IC system, annually during the last 3 years. | 29% of OECD countries fulfill | 6% of OECD partner and accession countries fulfill | ||
The central function has conducted a government-wide review of the IA system, annually during the last 3 years. | 34% of OECD countries fulfill | 9% of OECD partner and accession countries fulfill | ||
The CHU or the central IA function co-ordinates training and certification of internal auditors. | 21% of OECD countries fulfill | 6% of OECD partner and accession countries fulfill | ||
Guidelines on assessing integrity risks have been issued within the last 5 years by the CHU or the central function for IC to all public sector institutions implementing IC. | 32% of OECD countries fulfill | 6% of OECD partner and accession countries fulfill | Leading |