OECD Public Integrity IndicatorsHome

Slovak Republic

OECD member since 2000

This set of indicators covers countries’ strategic frameworks on anti-corruption. These could consist of a single strategy or be spread across multiple strategies, but all strategies must be adopted at the highest level of government (council of ministers/cabinet, president or parliament/congress). Data for OECD members was published in 2021 and 2024 with information relating to 2020 and 2023, respectively. Data for non-OECD countries was published in 2024, with information relating to 2023.

Coverage of strategic framework
ARGARGARMAUSAUTAUTBOLBIHBRABRABGRCANCANCHLCHLCOLCRICRIHRVCZECZEDNKDNKDOMECUESTFINFINFRAGRCGRCGTMHNDHUNHUNISLISLIDNIRLJPNJORKAZKORXKXLVALVALTULTUMEXMEXMDAMARNLDNLDNORNORPRYPERPERPOLPRTPRTROUROUSRBSYCSVKSVKESPSWESWESWECHECHETURTURUKRGBRUSAUSAZMBARGARMAUSAUTBOLBIHBRABGRCANCHLCOLCRIHRVCZEDNKDOMECUESTFINFRAGRCGTMHNDHUNISLIDNIRLJPNJORKAZKORXKXLVALTUMEXMDAMARNLDNORPRYPERPOLPRTROUSRBSYCSVKESPSWECHETURUKRGBRUSAZMBOECD_AVGOECD_AVGOECD_AVGOECD_AVGAPAC_AVGAPAC_AVGAPAC_AVGEU27_AVGEU27_AVGEU27_AVGEU27_AVGEurasia_AVGEurasia_AVGLAC_AVGLAC_AVGLAC_AVGMEA_AVGMEA_AVGSE_Europe_AVGSE_Europe_AVGSE_Europe_AVGSE_Europe_AVGBESTBESTBESTBESTALL_AVGALL_AVGALL_AVGALL_AVGOECD_ACC_AVGOECD_ACC_AVGOECD_ACC_AVGOECD_PARTNER_AVGOECD_PARTNER_AVGOECD_PARTNER_AVG
71.410085.742.985.757.157.157.171.471.485.70085.7010057.157.142.985.710014.314.3071.471.471.428.610057.100085.71000085.7014.314.357.142.914.310010010010010085.742.985.742.914.30042.971.471.485.785.785.710071.457.1085.785.7042.971.414.357.1057.157.171.485.771.471.471.471.485.742.985.757.157.171.485.7085.710057.142.985.714.3071.471.471.410057.10085.7085.7014.314.357.142.914.310010010042.985.742.9042.971.485.785.710057.1085.7071.457.157.171.485.771.471.449.857.878.659.933.385.746.459.86778.668.664.364.369.452.45642.942.971.460.757.159.510010085.710053.254.967.956.678.675.575.54157.142.9

List of indicators for Quality of strategic framework

Click on an indicator to see the criteria that are used to calculate it.

Top performing and underperforming criteria in Slovak Republic

This table shows the criteria within this dataset where the selected country performs the most above and below average. OECD countries are compared to the OECD average and partner countries are compared to the partner country average. Only criteria fulfilled by less than 40% of countries are shown as leading, and only criteria fulfilled by more than 40% of countries are shown as lagging.

The public consultation portal contains a summary sheet for all draft strategies with responses to all submitted comments provided during the public consultation.

13%

of OECD countries fulfill

22%

of OECD partner and accession countries fulfill

Leading

Current strategies all have an end-of-term evaluation listed as an activity in their action plan.

26%

of OECD countries fulfill

25%

of OECD partner and accession countries fulfill

Leading

At least one action plan includes data sources from staff, household, or business surveys.

34%

of OECD countries fulfill

16%

of OECD partner and accession countries fulfill

Leading

At least one action plan includes activities to collaborate with institutions at the subnational level.

50%

of OECD countries fulfill

47%

of OECD partner and accession countries fulfill

Lagging

All strategies include a situation analysis, including identification of existing public integrity risks.

42%

of OECD countries fulfill

53%

of OECD partner and accession countries fulfill

Lagging

At least one non-state actor has been a member of a working group mandated to develop or amend public integrity strategies in force.

42%

of OECD countries fulfill

41%

of OECD partner and accession countries fulfill

Lagging

An evaluation report exists for all predecessor strategies.

45%

of OECD countries fulfill

38%

of OECD partner and accession countries fulfill

Lagging

All evaluation reports for predecessor strategies have been published online by the national authorities.

39%

of OECD countries fulfill

31%

of OECD partner and accession countries fulfill

Non-state actors were involved in the evaluation of at least one of the predecessor strategies, either as evaluators or as part of a formal review/quality assurance mechanism.

39%

of OECD countries fulfill

34%

of OECD partner and accession countries fulfill

Current strategies all have an end-of-term evaluation listed as an activity in their action plan.

26%

of OECD countries fulfill

25%

of OECD partner and accession countries fulfill

Leading

Current strategies have all used evidence from evaluations of predecessor strategies to inform their approach.

42%

of OECD countries fulfill

34%

of OECD partner and accession countries fulfill

Lagging