Türkiye
OECD member since 1960
This set of indicators covers countries’ strategic frameworks on anti-corruption. These could consist of a single strategy or be spread across multiple strategies, but all strategies must be adopted at the highest level of government (council of ministers/cabinet, president or parliament/congress). Data for OECD members was published in 2021 and 2024 with information relating to 2020 and 2023, respectively. Data for non-OECD countries was published in 2024, with information relating to 2023.
| ARG | AUS | AUT | BRA | CAN | CHL | CRI | CZE | DNK | EST | FIN | FRA | GRC | IRL | JPN | KOR | LVA | LTU | LUX | MEX | NLD | NOR | PER | POL | PRT | SVK | SVN | ESP | SWE | TUR | UKR | USA | ARG | AUS | AUT | BRA | CAN | CHL | CRI | CZE | DNK | EST | FIN | FRA | GRC | IRL | JPN | KOR | LVA | LTU | LUX | MEX | NLD | NOR | PER | POL | PRT | SVK | SVN | ESP | SWE | TUR | UKR | USA | OECD_AVG | OECD_AVG | APAC_AVG | APAC_AVG | EU27_AVG | EU27_AVG | Eurasia_AVG | Eurasia_AVG | LAC_AVG | LAC_AVG | BEST | BEST | BEST | ALL_AVG | ALL_AVG | ALL_AVG | OECD_ACC_AVG | OECD_ACC_AVG | OECD_PARTNER_AVG | OECD_PARTNER_AVG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 90 | 70 | 40 | 90 | 100 | 70 | 100 | 60 | 50 | 100 | 90 | 90 | 100 | 90 | 30 | 80 | 70 | 100 | 40 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 40 | 80 | 80 | 80 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 40 | 70 | 100 | 90 | 70 | 40 | 90 | 100 | 70 | 100 | 60 | 50 | 100 | 90 | 90 | 100 | 90 | 30 | 80 | 70 | 100 | 40 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 40 | 80 | 80 | 80 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 40 | 70 | 100 | 80.7 | 80.7 | 60 | 60 | 81.7 | 81.7 | 70 | 70 | 81.7 | 81.7 | 100 | 70 | 100 | 80 | 70 | 79.7 | 73.3 | 73.3 | 70 | 70 |
List of indicators for Effectiveness of internal control and risk management
Click on an indicator to see the criteria that are used to calculate it.
Top performing and underperforming criteria in Türkiye
This table shows the criteria within this dataset where the selected country performs the most above and below average. OECD countries are compared to the OECD average and partner countries are compared to the partner country average. Only criteria fulfilled by less than 40% of countries are shown as leading, and only criteria fulfilled by more than 40% of countries are shown as lagging.
At least 85% of public officials performing internal audit functions have obtained a national or international certificate for IA. | 8% of OECD countries fulfill | 0% of OECD partner and accession countries fulfill | Leading | |
More than 50% of public bodies covered by IC provided a self-assessment report regarding the maturity of their IC systems during the latest full calendar year. | 18% of OECD countries fulfill | 3% of OECD partner and accession countries fulfill | Leading | |
The CHU or the central IA function co-ordinates training and certification of internal auditors. | 21% of OECD countries fulfill | 6% of OECD partner and accession countries fulfill | Leading | |
Regulations for implementing internal control are applicable to all central government institutions, including social security funds. | 63% of OECD countries fulfill | 9% of OECD partner and accession countries fulfill | Lagging | |
Standards of conduct and ethical behaviour are published and applicable for ministers. | 63% of OECD countries fulfill | 9% of OECD partner and accession countries fulfill | Lagging | |
The risk management framework explicitly delegates responsibility for conducting risk assessments to management, not internal auditors. | 61% of OECD countries fulfill | 9% of OECD partner and accession countries fulfill | Lagging |
One central government body (CHU) develops the IC and IA systems. | 39% of OECD countries fulfill | 9% of OECD partner and accession countries fulfill | ||
A central function develops the IC system. | 50% of OECD countries fulfill | 9% of OECD partner and accession countries fulfill | ||
A central function develops the IA system. | 50% of OECD countries fulfill | 9% of OECD partner and accession countries fulfill | ||
The CHU promotes IC and IA methodologies based on international standards. | 39% of OECD countries fulfill | 9% of OECD partner and accession countries fulfill | ||
A central function promotes IC methodologies based on international standards. | 50% of OECD countries fulfill | 9% of OECD partner and accession countries fulfill | ||
A central function promotes IA methodologies based on international standards. | 50% of OECD countries fulfill | 9% of OECD partner and accession countries fulfill | ||
The CHU has conducted a government-wide review on the IC and IA systems, annually during the last 3 years. | 26% of OECD countries fulfill | 6% of OECD partner and accession countries fulfill | ||
The central function has conducted a government-wide review of the IC system, annually during the last 3 years. | 29% of OECD countries fulfill | 6% of OECD partner and accession countries fulfill | ||
The central function has conducted a government-wide review of the IA system, annually during the last 3 years. | 34% of OECD countries fulfill | 9% of OECD partner and accession countries fulfill | ||
The CHU or the central IA function co-ordinates training and certification of internal auditors. | 21% of OECD countries fulfill | 6% of OECD partner and accession countries fulfill | Leading | |
Guidelines on assessing integrity risks have been issued within the last 5 years by the CHU or the central function for IC to all public sector institutions implementing IC. | 32% of OECD countries fulfill | 6% of OECD partner and accession countries fulfill |