Use of corruption risk management

Review of the evidence and data sources used for strategy development, either referenced in the strategies themselves or background materials provided by the national authorities, for the public integrity strategies identified in indicator 1.

1. Within the last five years, an inter-institutional body has prepared and published an analytical report on public integrity risks that formulates recommendations and sets priorities for the whole public integrity system.

Value
Czech Republic
Lithuania
Mexico
Portugal
Argentina
Australia
Austria
Brazil
Canada
Colombia
Denmark
Finland
France
Germany
Hungary
Japan
Latvia
Netherlands
Peru
Poland
Romania
Slovak Republic
Sweden
Türkiye
United Kingdom
United States
Belgium

No Strategic Framework

Chile

No Strategic Framework

Costa Rica

In Data Collection Stage

Estonia

No Strategic Framework

Greece

No Strategic Framework

Iceland

No Strategic Framework

Ireland

No Strategic Framework

Israel

No Strategic Framework

Italy

No Strategic Framework

Korea

No Strategic Framework

Luxembourg

No Strategic Framework

New Zealand

No Strategic Framework

Norway

No Strategic Framework

Slovenia

No Strategic Framework

Spain

No Strategic Framework

Switzerland

No Strategic Framework

2. Each existing strategy is based on an assessment of public integrity risks, identifying as a minimum specific types of relevant integrity breaches, the actors likely to be involved, as well as the expected likelihood and impact if the risk materialises.

Value
Canada
Czech Republic
France
Hungary
Latvia
Mexico
Peru
Poland
United Kingdom
Argentina
Australia
Austria
Brazil
Colombia
Denmark
Finland
Germany
Japan
Lithuania
Netherlands
Portugal
Romania
Slovak Republic
Sweden
Türkiye
United States
Belgium

No Strategic Framework

Chile

No Strategic Framework

Costa Rica

In Data Collection Stage

Estonia

No Strategic Framework

Greece

No Strategic Framework

Iceland

No Strategic Framework

Ireland

No Strategic Framework

Israel

No Strategic Framework

Italy

No Strategic Framework

Korea

No Strategic Framework

Luxembourg

No Strategic Framework

New Zealand

No Strategic Framework

Norway

No Strategic Framework

Slovenia

No Strategic Framework

Spain

No Strategic Framework

Switzerland

No Strategic Framework

3. Each existing strategy refers to at least 4 out of the following 8 sources of information related to public integrity: (a) indicators from international organisations or research institutions, (b) employee surveys, (c) household surveys, (d) business surveys, (e) other survey data, such as user surveys, or polls from local research institutions, (f) data from public registries (e.g. law enforcement, audit institutions, national statistics office), (g) published research documents from national or international organisations or academia (e.g. articles, reports, working papers, political economy analysis) and (h) commissioned research.

Value
Argentina
Czech Republic
France
Hungary
Latvia
Lithuania
Mexico
Peru
Poland
Romania
United Kingdom
United States
Australia
Austria
Brazil
Canada
Colombia
Denmark
Finland
Germany
Japan
Netherlands
Portugal
Slovak Republic
Sweden
Türkiye
Belgium

No Strategic Framework

Chile

No Strategic Framework

Costa Rica

In Data Collection Stage

Estonia

No Strategic Framework

Greece

No Strategic Framework

Iceland

No Strategic Framework

Ireland

No Strategic Framework

Israel

No Strategic Framework

Italy

No Strategic Framework

Korea

No Strategic Framework

Luxembourg

No Strategic Framework

New Zealand

No Strategic Framework

Norway

No Strategic Framework

Slovenia

No Strategic Framework

Spain

No Strategic Framework

Switzerland

No Strategic Framework