Quality of strategy documents

Review of the public integrity strategies that quality for indicator 1.

1. All strategies include a situation analysis, including identification of existing public integrity risks.

Value
Argentina
Brazil
Czech Republic
Hungary
Latvia
Lithuania
Mexico
Peru
Poland
Romania
United Kingdom
Australia
Austria
Canada
Colombia
Denmark
Finland
France
Germany
Japan
Netherlands
Portugal
Slovak Republic
Sweden
Turkey
Belgium
Chile
Costa Rica
Estonia
Greece
Iceland
Ireland
Israel
Italy
Korea
Luxembourg
New Zealand
Norway
Slovenia
Spain
Switzerland
United States

2. All strategies contain outcome-level indicators for the public integrity objectives.

Value
Austria
Canada
Czech Republic
Latvia
Lithuania
Mexico
Peru
Poland
Portugal
Slovak Republic
United Kingdom
Argentina
Australia
Brazil
Colombia
Denmark
Finland
France
Germany
Hungary
Japan
Netherlands
Romania
Sweden
Turkey
Belgium
Chile
Costa Rica
Estonia
Greece
Iceland
Ireland
Israel
Italy
Korea
Luxembourg
New Zealand
Norway
Slovenia
Spain
Switzerland
United States

3. All strategies set target values for all outcome-level indicators.

Value
Canada
Latvia
Lithuania
Mexico
Poland
Argentina
Australia
Austria
Brazil
Colombia
Czech Republic
Denmark
Finland
France
Germany
Hungary
Japan
Netherlands
Peru
Portugal
Romania
Slovak Republic
Sweden
Turkey
United Kingdom
Belgium
Chile
Costa Rica
Estonia
Greece
Iceland
Ireland
Israel
Italy
Korea
Luxembourg
New Zealand
Norway
Slovenia
Spain
Switzerland
United States

4. At least one strategy refers to at least one international legal instrument relating to public integrity.

Value
Argentina
Australia
Austria
Brazil
Czech Republic
France
Hungary
Latvia
Lithuania
Mexico
Peru
Poland
Portugal
Romania
Slovak Republic
United Kingdom
Canada
Colombia
Denmark
Finland
Germany
Japan
Netherlands
Sweden
Turkey
Belgium
Chile
Costa Rica
Estonia
Greece
Iceland
Ireland
Israel
Italy
Korea
Luxembourg
New Zealand
Norway
Slovenia
Spain
Switzerland
United States