Implementation structures, action plans and monitoring reports

Review of the structures and responsible functions for the implementation of the strategy and its action plan. National authorities are asked to provide information on the implementation structures for each strategy and provide the action plans and monitoring reports.

1. For each strategy, there is a central coordination function responsible for coordinating the implementation, monitoring, reporting, and evaluation of the action plan.

Value
Argentina
Austria
Brazil
Canada
Czech Republic
France
Hungary
Latvia
Lithuania
Mexico
Peru
Poland
Romania
Slovak Republic
Sweden
United Kingdom
Australia
Colombia
Denmark
Finland
Germany
Japan
Netherlands
Portugal
Turkey
Belgium
Chile
Costa Rica
Estonia
Greece
Iceland
Ireland
Israel
Italy
Korea
Luxembourg
New Zealand
Norway
Slovenia
Spain
Switzerland
United States

2. All public integrity strategies have an action plan in force.

Value
Argentina
Austria
Brazil
Canada
Colombia
Czech Republic
Hungary
Latvia
Lithuania
Mexico
Peru
Poland
Portugal
Romania
Slovak Republic
United Kingdom
Australia
Denmark
Finland
France
Germany
Japan
Netherlands
Sweden
Turkey
Belgium
Chile
Costa Rica
Estonia
Greece
Iceland
Ireland
Israel
Italy
Korea
Luxembourg
New Zealand
Norway
Slovenia
Spain
Switzerland
United States

3. All action plans include objectives with dedicated outcome-level indicators, baseline targets, and a list of activities.

Value
Argentina
Austria
Canada
Colombia
Czech Republic
Latvia
Lithuania
Mexico
Peru
Portugal
Australia
Brazil
Denmark
Finland
France
Germany
Hungary
Japan
Netherlands
Poland
Romania
Slovak Republic
Sweden
Turkey
United Kingdom
Belgium
Chile
Costa Rica
Estonia
Greece
Iceland
Ireland
Israel
Italy
Korea
Luxembourg
New Zealand
Norway
Slovenia
Spain
Switzerland
United States

4. All action plans identify lead organisations at least for each objective.

Value
Argentina
Austria
Canada
Colombia
Czech Republic
Hungary
Latvia
Lithuania
Mexico
Peru
Poland
Slovak Republic
Turkey
Australia
Brazil
Denmark
Finland
France
Germany
Japan
Netherlands
Portugal
Romania
Sweden
United Kingdom
Belgium
Chile
Costa Rica
Estonia
Greece
Iceland
Ireland
Israel
Italy
Korea
Luxembourg
New Zealand
Norway
Slovenia
Spain
Switzerland
United States

5. All action plans contain a section specifying the monitoring, reporting, and evaluation arrangements.

Value
Colombia
Czech Republic
Hungary
Latvia
Lithuania
Mexico
Poland
Romania
Slovak Republic
United Kingdom
Argentina
Australia
Austria
Brazil
Canada
Denmark
Finland
France
Germany
Japan
Netherlands
Peru
Portugal
Sweden
Turkey
Belgium
Chile
Costa Rica
Estonia
Greece
Iceland
Ireland
Israel
Italy
Korea
Luxembourg
New Zealand
Norway
Slovenia
Spain
Switzerland
United States

6. All action plans reference administrative data sources from existing public registries.

Value
Argentina
Latvia
Mexico
Peru
Poland
Romania
United Kingdom
Australia
Austria
Brazil
Canada
Colombia
Czech Republic
Denmark
Finland
France
Germany
Hungary
Japan
Lithuania
Netherlands
Portugal
Slovak Republic
Sweden
Turkey
Belgium
Chile
Costa Rica
Estonia
Greece
Iceland
Ireland
Israel
Italy
Korea
Luxembourg
New Zealand
Norway
Slovenia
Spain
Switzerland
United States

7. At least one action plan includes data sources from staff, household, or business surveys.

Value
Argentina
Colombia
France
Latvia
Lithuania
Mexico
Peru
Romania
Slovak Republic
Turkey
United Kingdom
Australia
Austria
Brazil
Canada
Czech Republic
Denmark
Finland
Germany
Hungary
Japan
Netherlands
Poland
Portugal
Sweden
Belgium
Chile
Costa Rica
Estonia
Greece
Iceland
Ireland
Israel
Italy
Korea
Luxembourg
New Zealand
Norway
Slovenia
Spain
Switzerland
United States

8. At least one action plan includes activities to collaborate with institutions at the subnational level.

Value
Argentina
Austria
Colombia
Czech Republic
France
Latvia
Lithuania
Mexico
Peru
Poland
Romania
Turkey
United Kingdom
Australia
Brazil
Canada
Denmark
Finland
Germany
Hungary
Japan
Netherlands
Portugal
Slovak Republic
Sweden
Belgium
Chile
Costa Rica
Estonia
Greece
Iceland
Ireland
Israel
Italy
Korea
Luxembourg
New Zealand
Norway
Slovenia
Spain
Switzerland
United States

9. All action plans are published as a minimum on the website of the responsible body.

Value
Argentina
Austria
Brazil
Canada
Czech Republic
France
Hungary
Latvia
Lithuania
Mexico
Poland
Portugal
Romania
Slovak Republic
United Kingdom
Australia
Colombia
Denmark
Finland
Germany
Japan
Netherlands
Peru
Sweden
Turkey
Belgium
Chile
Costa Rica
Estonia
Greece
Iceland
Ireland
Israel
Italy
Korea
Luxembourg
New Zealand
Norway
Slovenia
Spain
Switzerland
United States

10. Monitoring reports are published for all action plans, at least once a year, and publically available no later than 3 months after the defined reporting schedule.

Value
Canada
Czech Republic
Lithuania
Mexico
Poland
Romania
United Kingdom
Argentina
Australia
Austria
Brazil
Colombia
Denmark
Finland
France
Germany
Hungary
Japan
Latvia
Netherlands
Peru
Portugal
Slovak Republic
Sweden
Turkey
Belgium
Chile
Costa Rica
Estonia
Greece
Iceland
Ireland
Israel
Italy
Korea
Luxembourg
New Zealand
Norway
Slovenia
Spain
Switzerland
United States

11. All monitoring reports report on progress against pre-defined indicators and targets in the action plan.

Value
Canada
Colombia
Czech Republic
Latvia
Lithuania
Mexico
Poland
Romania
United Kingdom
Argentina
Australia
Austria
Brazil
Denmark
Finland
France
Germany
Hungary
Japan
Netherlands
Peru
Portugal
Slovak Republic
Sweden
Turkey
Belgium
Chile
Costa Rica
Estonia
Greece
Iceland
Ireland
Israel
Italy
Korea
Luxembourg
New Zealand
Norway
Slovenia
Spain
Switzerland
United States

12. All monitoring reports present the rate of implementation for activities in the action plan.

Value
Czech Republic
Latvia
Lithuania
Mexico
Poland
Romania
United Kingdom
Argentina
Australia
Austria
Brazil
Canada
Colombia
Denmark
Finland
France
Germany
Hungary
Japan
Netherlands
Peru
Portugal
Slovak Republic
Sweden
Turkey
Belgium
Chile
Costa Rica
Estonia
Greece
Iceland
Ireland
Israel
Italy
Korea
Luxembourg
New Zealand
Norway
Slovenia
Spain
Switzerland
United States

13. All monitoring reports draw conclusions and have a dedicated section with recommendations to management.

Value
Argentina
Czech Republic
Latvia
Lithuania
Romania
Sweden
United Kingdom
Australia
Austria
Brazil
Canada
Colombia
Denmark
Finland
France
Germany
Hungary
Japan
Mexico
Netherlands
Peru
Poland
Portugal
Slovak Republic
Turkey
Belgium
Chile
Costa Rica
Estonia
Greece
Iceland
Ireland
Israel
Italy
Korea
Luxembourg
New Zealand
Norway
Slovenia
Spain
Switzerland
United States

14. The responsible body(ies) have initiated consultations with relevant state administration bodies to discuss the monitoring report(s) during the latest full calendar year.

Value
Argentina
Czech Republic
Germany
Hungary
Lithuania
Poland
Romania
United Kingdom
Australia
Austria
Brazil
Canada
Colombia
Denmark
Finland
France
Japan
Latvia
Mexico
Netherlands
Peru
Portugal
Slovak Republic
Sweden
Turkey
Belgium
Chile
Costa Rica
Estonia
Greece
Iceland
Ireland
Israel
Italy
Korea
Luxembourg
New Zealand
Norway
Slovenia
Spain
Switzerland
United States

15. At least one responsible body has initiated consultations with the general public and/or civil society organisations on its monitoring reports during the latest full calendar year or the year prior to that.

Value
Argentina
Czech Republic
France
Latvia
Romania
United Kingdom
Australia
Austria
Brazil
Canada
Colombia
Denmark
Finland
Germany
Hungary
Japan
Lithuania
Mexico
Netherlands
Peru
Poland
Portugal
Slovak Republic
Sweden
Turkey
Belgium
Chile
Costa Rica
Estonia
Greece
Iceland
Ireland
Israel
Italy
Korea
Luxembourg
New Zealand
Norway
Slovenia
Spain
Switzerland
United States