OECD Public Integrity IndicatorsHome

Thailand

OECD accession country since 2024

This set of indicators covers countries’ strategic frameworks on anti-corruption. These could consist of a single strategy or be spread across multiple strategies, but all strategies must be adopted at the highest level of government (council of ministers/cabinet, president or parliament/congress). Data for OECD members was published in 2021 and 2024 with information relating to 2020 and 2023, respectively. Data for non-OECD countries was published in 2024, with information relating to 2023.

Coverage of strategic framework
ARGARGARMAUSAUSAUTAUTAUTBELBOLBIHBRABRABRABGRCANCANCANCHLCHLCHLCOLCOLCRICRICRIHRVCZECZECZEDNKDNKDNKDOMECUESTESTFINFINFINFRAFRADEUDEUGRCGRCGRCGTMGTMHNDHUNHUNISLISLISLIDNIRLIRLISRITAJPNJORKAZKORKORXKXLVALVALVALTULTULTULUXMEXMEXMEXMDAMARNLDNLDNLDNZLNZLNORNORNORPRYPERPERPOLPOLPRTPRTPRTROUROUSRBSYCSVKSVKSVKSVNESPESPSWESWESWECHECHECHETHATURTURTURUKRGBRGBRUSAUSAUSAZMBARGARMAUSAUTBOLBIHBRABGRCHLCOLCRIHRVCZEECUESTFINFRAGRCGTMHUNIDNITAJPNJORKAZXKXLVALTUMEXMDAMARNLDNZLPRYPERPRTROUSRBSVKSVNESPSWETHAUKRGBRUSAZMBOECD_AVGOECD_AVGOECD_AVGOECD_AVGOECD_AVGAPAC_AVGAPAC_AVGAPAC_AVGAPAC_AVGEU27_AVGEU27_AVGEU27_AVGEU27_AVGEU27_AVGEurasia_AVGEurasia_AVGLAC_AVGLAC_AVGLAC_AVGLAC_AVGMEA_AVGMEA_AVGSE_Europe_AVGSE_Europe_AVGSE_Europe_AVGSE_Europe_AVGBESTBESTBESTBESTBESTALL_AVGALL_AVGALL_AVGALL_AVGALL_AVGOECD_ACC_AVGOECD_ACC_AVGOECD_ACC_AVGOECD_ACC_AVGOECD_PARTNER_AVGOECD_PARTNER_AVGOECD_PARTNER_AVGOECD_PARTNER_AVG
71.410085.742.942.985.785.757.1057.157.171.485.771.485.700085.785.7071.410057.157.157.142.985.785.710014.3014.3071.471.471.471.485.728.61001000057.157.10057.1085.710000085.700042.914.314.357.1042.914.3100100100100100100010085.785.742.985.742.971.414.342.957.100042.971.471.4085.785.742.985.710071.457.1085.742.985.710085.7042.971.414.357.10028.657.1057.171.457.185.771.471.471.471.471.485.742.985.757.157.185.785.785.771.457.142.985.771.471.485.710057.157.185.785.742.914.314.357.114.310010085.742.985.771.457.142.971.442.910057.142.910085.771.428.671.457.171.471.448.157.178.645.770.933.352.433.345.756.36778.653.676.764.364.369.452.473.868.842.957.171.460.757.159.510010085.710010051.75467.947.166.678.669.685.771.44157.157.156.1

List of indicators for Quality of strategic framework

Click on an indicator to see the criteria that are used to calculate it.

Top performing and underperforming criteria in Thailand

This table shows the criteria within this dataset where the selected country performs the most above and below average. OECD countries are compared to the OECD average and partner countries are compared to the partner country average. Only criteria fulfilled by less than 40% of countries are shown as leading, and only criteria fulfilled by more than 40% of countries are shown as lagging.

Strategic objectives are established for mitigating public integrity risks in public procurement.

58%

of OECD countries fulfill

47%

of OECD partner and accession countries fulfill

Lagging

All strategies set target values for all outcome-level indicators.

16%

of OECD countries fulfill

22%

of OECD partner and accession countries fulfill

Leading

At least one key integrity body has been consulted and provided inputs through the regular inter-institutional or public consultation procedures to at least one of the existing public integrity strategies.

Data to be improved

53%

of OECD countries fulfill

63%

of OECD partner and accession countries fulfill

Lagging

At least one strategy refers to at least one international legal instrument relating to public integrity.

53%

of OECD countries fulfill

59%

of OECD partner and accession countries fulfill

Lagging

At least one action plan includes data sources from staff, household, or business surveys.

32%

of OECD countries fulfill

19%

of OECD partner and accession countries fulfill

Leading

All action plans include objectives with dedicated outcome-level indicators, baseline targets, and a list of activities.

16%

of OECD countries fulfill

25%

of OECD partner and accession countries fulfill

Leading

An evaluation report exists for all predecessor strategies.

45%

of OECD countries fulfill

47%

of OECD partner and accession countries fulfill

All evaluation reports for predecessor strategies have been published online by the national authorities.

39%

of OECD countries fulfill

38%

of OECD partner and accession countries fulfill

Non-state actors were involved in the evaluation of at least one of the predecessor strategies, either as evaluators or as part of a formal review/quality assurance mechanism.

Data not available

34%

of OECD countries fulfill

38%

of OECD partner and accession countries fulfill

Current strategies all have an end-of-term evaluation listed as an activity in their action plan.

24%

of OECD countries fulfill

25%

of OECD partner and accession countries fulfill

Current strategies have all used evidence from evaluations of predecessor strategies to inform their approach.

Data to be improved

37%

of OECD countries fulfill

41%

of OECD partner and accession countries fulfill

Lagging