OECD Public Integrity IndicatorsHome

Argentina

OECD accession country since 2022; adherent to the Recommendation on Public Integrity since 2020

This set of indicators covers regulations and practice aimed at promoting integrity in the justice system and ensuring accountability through the disciplinary system for civil servants. Data for both OECD members and non-OECD members will be released in 2025.

Regulatory framework for judicial integrity
ARGARMAUSAUTBELBRABGRCANCHLCOLCRIHRVCZEDNKDOMECUFINFRADEUGTMHNDHUNIDNIRLITAKORLVALTULUXMDANLDNORPERPRTROUSRBSVKSVNESPSWECHETURUKRARGARMAUSAUTBELBRABGRCANCHLCOLCRIHRVCZEDNKDOMECUFINFRADEUGTMHNDHUNIDNIRLITAKORLVALTULUXMDANLDNORPERPRTROUSRBSVKSVNESPSWECHETURUKROECD_AVGOECD_AVGAPAC_AVGAPAC_AVGEU27_AVGEU27_AVGEurasia_AVGEurasia_AVGLAC_AVGLAC_AVGSE_Europe_AVGSE_Europe_AVGBESTBESTALL_AVGALL_AVGOECD_ACC_AVGOECD_ACC_AVGOECD_PARTNER_AVGOECD_PARTNER_AVG
55.994.126.573.547.158.891.247.161.876.573.588.276.541.258.870.658.858.885.358.852.988.241.235.373.558.894.194.164.710067.644.170.682.494.197.182.491.288.258.835.355.997.155.994.126.573.547.158.891.247.161.876.573.588.276.541.258.870.658.858.885.358.852.988.241.235.373.558.894.194.164.710067.744.170.682.494.197.182.491.288.258.835.355.997.165.865.842.242.274.374.397.197.163.863.892.792.710010069.169.171.471.478.778.7

List of indicators for Integrity of the justice and disciplinary systems

Click on an indicator to see the criteria that are used to calculate it.

Top performing and underperforming criteria in Argentina

This table shows the criteria within this dataset where the selected country performs the most above and below average. OECD countries are compared to the OECD average and partner countries are compared to the partner country average. Only criteria fulfilled by less than 40% of countries are shown as leading, and only criteria fulfilled by more than 40% of countries are shown as lagging.

Standards of conduct and ethical behaviour are published and applicable to all judges.

61%

of OECD countries fulfill

44%

of OECD partner and accession countries fulfill

Lagging

Regulations define the circumstances where prosecutors can be recused or should recuse themselves and establish a procedure to decide whether the prosecutor should continue on the case or how the conflict of interest should be resolved.

66%

of OECD countries fulfill

44%

of OECD partner and accession countries fulfill

Lagging

Standards of conduct and ethical behaviour are published and applicable to all prosecutors.

71%

of OECD countries fulfill

41%

of OECD partner and accession countries fulfill

Lagging

All central government bodies use an electronic case management system to manage disciplinary cases and proceedings.

16%

of OECD countries fulfill

9%

of OECD partner and accession countries fulfill

Leading

The electronic case management system for disciplinary cases and proceedings allows for documentation.

13%

of OECD countries fulfill

9%

of OECD partner and accession countries fulfill

Leading

The submission rate of interest declarations from the highest members of prosecutorial authorities is at least 80% for the past four years.

16%

of OECD countries fulfill

19%

of OECD partner and accession countries fulfill

Leading