OECD Public Integrity IndicatorsHome

Dominican Republic

OECD partner country

This set of indicators covers regulations and practice aimed at promoting integrity in the justice system and ensuring accountability through the disciplinary system for civil servants. Data for both OECD members and non-OECD members will be released in 2025.

Regulatory framework for judicial integrity
ARGARMAUSAUTBELBRABGRCANCHLCOLCRIHRVCZEDNKDOMECUFINFRADEUGTMHNDHUNIDNIRLITAKORLVALTULUXMDAMARNLDNORPANPERPRTROUSRBSVKSVNESPSWECHETURUKRARGARMAUSAUTBELBRABGRCANCHLCOLCRIHRVCZEDNKDOMECUFINFRADEUGTMHNDHUNIDNIRLITAKORLVALTULUXMDAMARNLDNORPANPERPRTROUSRBSVKSVNESPSWECHETURUKROECD_AVGOECD_AVGAPAC_AVGAPAC_AVGEU27_AVGEU27_AVGEurasia_AVGEurasia_AVGLAC_AVGLAC_AVGMEA_AVGMEA_AVGSE_Europe_AVGSE_Europe_AVGBESTBESTALL_AVGALL_AVGOECD_ACC_AVGOECD_ACC_AVGOECD_PARTNER_AVGOECD_PARTNER_AVG
55.994.126.573.547.158.891.247.161.876.573.588.276.541.255.970.658.858.885.358.852.988.241.235.373.558.894.194.164.710038.267.644.164.770.682.494.197.182.491.288.258.835.355.997.155.994.126.573.547.158.891.247.161.876.573.588.276.541.255.970.658.858.885.358.852.988.241.235.373.558.894.194.164.710038.267.744.164.770.682.494.197.182.491.288.258.835.355.997.165.865.842.242.274.374.397.197.163.663.638.238.292.792.710010068.268.271.471.472.972.9

List of indicators for Integrity of the justice and disciplinary systems

Click on an indicator to see the criteria that are used to calculate it.

Top performing and underperforming criteria in Dominican Republic

This table shows the criteria within this dataset where the selected country performs the most above and below average. OECD countries are compared to the OECD average and partner countries are compared to the partner country average. Only criteria fulfilled by less than 40% of countries are shown as leading, and only criteria fulfilled by more than 40% of countries are shown as lagging.

Regulations establish that the promotion of judges is based on the recommendations of an independent body.

29%

of OECD countries fulfill

28%

of OECD partner and accession countries fulfill

Leading

Regulations establish the right of candidates to appeal decisions on the appointment and promotion of judges.

29%

of OECD countries fulfill

28%

of OECD partner and accession countries fulfill

Leading

Regulations establish standard aggravating factors in the determination of disciplinary sanctions for judicial misconduct.

26%

of OECD countries fulfill

38%

of OECD partner and accession countries fulfill

Leading

Organisational units or teams of prosecutors responsible for the investigation and prosecution of corruption and financial crime are established in public prosecution offices.

68%

of OECD countries fulfill

44%

of OECD partner and accession countries fulfill

Lagging

Regulations define the circumstances and relationships that can lead to conflict-of-interest situations for prosecutors.

63%

of OECD countries fulfill

41%

of OECD partner and accession countries fulfill

Lagging

Regulations establish the right to appeal a disciplinary decision in front of a judicial body after exhausting the administrative remedies.

63%

of OECD countries fulfill

41%

of OECD partner and accession countries fulfill

Lagging