OECD Public Integrity IndicatorsHome

Norway

OECD member since 1960

This set of indicators covers regulations and practice aimed at promoting integrity in the justice system and ensuring accountability through the disciplinary system for civil servants. Data for both OECD members and non-OECD members will be released in 2025.

Regulatory framework for judicial integrity
AUSAUTBELCANCHLCOLCRICZEDNKFINFRADEUHUNIRLITAKORLVALTULUXNLDNORPRTSVKSVNESPSWECHETURAUSAUTBELCANCHLCOLCRICZEDNKFINFRADEUHUNIRLITAKORLVALTULUXNLDNORPRTSVKSVNESPSWECHETUROECD_AVGOECD_AVGAPAC_AVGAPAC_AVGEU27_AVGEU27_AVGLAC_AVGLAC_AVGBESTBESTALL_AVGALL_AVG
26.573.547.147.161.876.573.576.541.258.858.885.388.235.373.558.894.194.164.767.644.182.482.491.288.258.835.355.926.573.547.147.161.876.573.576.541.258.858.885.388.235.373.558.894.194.164.767.744.182.482.491.288.258.835.355.965.865.842.742.771.771.770.670.694.194.165.865.8

List of indicators for Integrity of the justice and disciplinary systems

Click on an indicator to see the criteria that are used to calculate it.

Top performing and underperforming criteria in Norway

This table shows the criteria within this dataset where the selected country performs the most above and below average. OECD countries are compared to the OECD average and partner countries are compared to the partner country average. Only criteria fulfilled by less than 40% of countries are shown as leading, and only criteria fulfilled by more than 40% of countries are shown as lagging.

Regulations determine a procedure for the allocation of cases to prosecutors based either on random assignment or objective criteria.

24%

of OECD countries fulfill

0%

of OECD partner and accession countries fulfill

Leading

Regulations establish a range of disciplinary sanctions for each type of disciplinary offence, which vary according to the severity and circumstances of the offence.

63%

of OECD countries fulfill

0%

of OECD partner and accession countries fulfill

Lagging

Regulations establish a complaints procedure to address formal public allegations of prosecutorial misconduct.

61%

of OECD countries fulfill

0%

of OECD partner and accession countries fulfill

Lagging

Sanctions for breaches of prosecutorial conflict-of-interest provisions are defined in law and the law envisages a range of sanctions depending on the severity of the offence.

58%

of OECD countries fulfill

0%

of OECD partner and accession countries fulfill

Lagging

Whistleblower cases in courts are handled by the same staff member(s) until completion.

18%

of OECD countries fulfill

0%

of OECD partner and accession countries fulfill

Leading

An electronic system is used for managing and tracking all complaints received.

24%

of OECD countries fulfill

0%

of OECD partner and accession countries fulfill

Leading